What is being said?
The accusation or political characterization appears first and is kept separate from our analysis.
Independent · source-linked · plain language
Iowa · General Election · November 3, 2026
Meet the candidate.
Then examine the claim.
Choose one candidate at a time. Read a short biography, see what is being said about them, and open a documented evidence trail when you want the details.
Choose one
Iowa candidates
Major races are listed first. Office colors show jurisdiction—not a rating.
State officeFederal office
Simple by design
Three things to look for
How hot is the claim?
The thermometer rises as the gap grows between the wording of a claim and what the cited evidence actually establishes.
Can I audit the conclusion?
Each reviewed claim identifies the primary record, independent context, the source making the allegation, and any fair criticism that remains.
On the campaign trail
Candidate profile
Campaign links open the candidate’s own website. They are provided for primary-source access, not endorsement.
Attack ad review
Watch the advertisement being reviewed
These are original sponsor-hosted political advertisements embedded for documentation and fact-checking. The explanation immediately below each video separates what the ad says from what the cited record establishes.
Claim review
What is being said
The claim, evidence-gap temperature, and plain-language bottom line come first. Open the evidence to audit how the rating was reached.
Cool → hot: green means the criticism is substantially supported. Yellow, orange and red indicate progressively larger gaps between the wording and what the evidence establishes. Gray is reserved for subjective political labels. The gauge measures the evidence gap—not whether a speaker intended to deceive.
Background & public service
What the record shows
Career, achievements, public service, recorded votes and original-source links for visitors who want to dig deeper.
Record snapshot
Career & public-service record
Key documented milestones and background that help put the candidate’s record in context.
Achievements & service
What they have done
Documented accomplishments, public-service work and professional milestones, with source links where available.
Public voting record
Voting Record Explorer
Context matters: A vote on a broad or omnibus measure should not automatically be treated as proof that a candidate supported or opposed every subsection. Each example below explains what the larger measure covered and links to the public record.
Profile source trailGovernment records, independent reporting and candidate materials are labeled by source class.